Man Arrested For Leading Role In $10 Million Tech Support Fraud Scheme That Exploited Elderly Victims | USAO-SDNY

Damian Williams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, declared charges versus VINOTH PONMARAN for participating in a conspiracy that for numerous decades exploited elderly victims by remotely accessing their personal computers and convincing victims to fork out for computer system aid services they did not have to have, and which were in no way really offered.  In total, the conspiracy produced a lot more than $10 million in proceeds from at the very least about 7,500 victims.  PONMARAN was arrested on Friday in Blaine, Washington, and will be offered in the Western District of Washington.  The circumstance has been assigned to U.S. District Decide Paul A. Crotty.

U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said:  “As alleged, the defendant was a leader of a refined fraud plan that preyed on victims, together with the aged.  This conspiracy allegedly prompted pop-up home windows to surface on victims’ computers—pop-up windows which claimed, falsely, that a virus had infected the victim’s laptop or computer.  By way of this and other misrepresentations, this fraud scheme deceived countless numbers of victims, which includes some of society’s most vulnerable customers, into having to pay a full of extra than $10 million.  Many thanks to our companions at Homeland Protection Investigations, this plan has been dismantled.”

In accordance to the allegations contained in the Superseding Indictment,[1] as nicely as court docket filings and statements produced in courtroom in link with the scenarios of PONMARAN’s co-defendants:

From about March 2015 by way of December 2018, PONMARAN was a member of a legal fraud ring (the “Fraud Ring”) primarily based in the United States and India that committed a specialized aid fraud scheme focusing on elderly victims situated across the United States and Canada, like in the Southern District of New York.  The Fraud Ring’s primary objective was to trick victims into believing that their personal computers had been contaminated with malware, in get to deceive them into paying out hundreds or thousands of pounds for phony pc restore products and services.  Above the program of the conspiracy, the Fraud Ring produced extra than $10 million in proceeds from at the very least 7,500 victims.

The scheme typically worked as follows.  1st, the Fraud Ring triggered pop-up windows to show up on victims’ computer systems.  The pop-up windows claimed, falsely, that a virus experienced contaminated the victim’s computer.  The pop-up window directed the target to call a certain telephone range to attain technological guidance.  In at minimum some instances, the pop-up window threatened victims that, if they restarted or shut down their laptop, it could “cause major damage to the program,” which include “complete info loss.”  In an try to give the untrue overall look of legitimacy, in some scenarios the pop-up window involved, with out authorization, the company brand of a perfectly-recognised, legit technological know-how company.  In point, no virus had contaminated victims’ desktops, and the technological help cell phone figures ended up not related with the respectable technologies organization.  Instead, these representations were wrong and were created to trick victims into paying the Fraud Ring to “fix” a challenge that did not exist.  And although the purported “virus” was a hoax, the pop-up window by itself did lead to numerous victims’ personal computers to wholly “freeze,” thereby avoiding these victims from accessing the data and information in their computer—which triggered some victims to get in touch with the mobile phone range stated on the pop-up window.  In trade for victims’ payment of quite a few hundred or thousand bucks (based on the specific “service” victims ordered), the purported technician remotely accessed the victim’s pc and ran an anti-virus resource, which is cost-free and out there on the Net.  The Fraud Ring also re-victimized several victims, after they had manufactured payments to purportedly “fix” their tech troubles.

PONMARAN was an India-centered chief of the Fraud Ring.  Among other points, PONMARAN managed a contact center in India that was employed to provide purported computer system restore products and services to victims of the plan.  PONMARAN also recruited co-conspirators in the United States to sign-up fraudulent corporate entities and open up lender accounts that were employed to get fraud proceeds from victims of the plan.  PONMARAN also directed co-conspirators to wire fraud proceeds from the United States to accounts in India.

*                *                *

PONMARAN, 34, a citizen of India, is charged with 1 rely of wire fraud and one depend of conspiracy to dedicate wire fraud, each of which carries a most sentence of 20 several years in jail.  The statutory maximum sentences are approved by Congress and are provided listed here for informational functions only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be established by the choose.

PONMARAN’s co-defendants, Romana Leyva and Ariful Haque, have been equally sentenced previously this year, adhering to their respective guilty pleas.  Leyva was sentenced to 100 months in jail and 3 yrs of supervised release, and she was requested to shell out forfeiture of $4,679,586.93 and restitution of $2,707,882.91.  Haque was sentenced to one year and a person working day in jail and three a long time of supervised release, and he was ordered to pay out forfeiture of $38,886.32 and restitution of $470,672.16.

Mr. Williams praised the excellent get the job done of the New York Office environment of the Homeland Safety Investigations (“HSI”)’s El Dorado Process Pressure, Cyber Intrusion/Cyber Fraud Team.  Mr. Williams also thanked the New York City Police Office for its help on this situation. 

This matter is being dealt with by the Office’s Intricate Frauds and Cybercrime Device.  Assistant United States Attorney Michael D. Neff is in cost of the prosecution.

 


[1] The entirety of the textual content of the Superseding Indictment, and the description of the Superseding Indictment set forth herein, constitute only allegations, and every single actuality described ought to be taken care of as an allegation.